The Mangement Of The Wep Keys Was A Problem For Users In That Admistrators

The Mangement of the WEP keys was a problem for users in that admistrators found it very difficult to manage large amounts of keys and therefore the keys were not changed very often and this made the life of hackers much easier to get into so called 'secure networks.' RSN however establishes a hierarchy of limited life keys, thus being similar to that used for TKIP. AES/CCMP requires 512bits to accommodate all the keys, which is less than that of TKIP and therefore more manageable for the administrator. Similar to TKIP, master keys are not used directly, but are used to derive other keys. For the administrator they only have the responsibility of looking after the Master key (Laverty, 2003).
3.0Conclusion
There are systems and actions for users to take to ensure Wi-Fi is secure against hackers such as monitoring their input output ports with dedicated firewalls or network analyzers. In addition, the user should use the more mature and secure method of securing information from one device and another. These security methods are WPA2, the user should stay away from less developed security technologies such as WEP and WPA early standards.
REFERENCES
How Wifi Works, http://computer.howstuffworks.com/wireless-network1.htm, 2005
Complementary code keying, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complementary_code_keying, 2006
Solms B.S., Marais E. (2004), From secure wired networks to secure wireless networks e what are the extra risks?, Computer and Security
Air Defense White Paper. (2004)., 5 Practical steps to secure your wireless LAN, http://www.airdefense.netO.
Loeb L., (2001), What's up with WEP?, http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/library/s-wep/, Secure Electronic Transactions
It came out of sky WEP 2 (2001), http://www.starkrealities.com/wireless003.html
Laverty D, (2003), WPA versus 802.11i (WPA2): How your Choice Affects your Wireless Network Security, http://www.openxtra.co.uk/articles/wpa-vs-80211i.phpLegally Binding Undertaking

I undertake that in line with my contractual obligations this work is completely original, and has not been copied from any website or any other source, either in whole or in part.
By submitting this work I understand that if my work is found to be plagiarised that I will not only forfeit my fee but also be subject to legal proceedings in order to recover damages for loss of profit and damage to business reputation.
Moreover, I understand that I may be subject to legal proceedings from any third parties, such as the end clients and copyright holders of the original work who may have had their rights infringed or suffered loss as a result of my actions.
I also understand that in addition I will be liable to a £100/$200 administration charge and that I may be liable for legal costs.
I understand that this e-mail and the work I am submitting may be used as evidence against me if I breach this undertaking.