Review of previous literature discovered the importance loyalty
card in relationship marketing.
3.0 METHODOLOGY
3.1 INTRODUCTION
This section will discuss
the research procedure, the sampling frame, sampling, methodology,
questionnaire design, the survey and method of analysis employed.
3.2 THE SURVEY
As discussed recently, issues associated with the effect of
loyalty card in relationship marketing have become more evident.
Furthermore, decreases over the past decide number of companies
using loyalty card has occurred. The study sought to investigate
whether loyalty card are effective in relationship marketing
3.3 DEFINITION OF POPULATION
“The primary step to sampling is to define
the population that is to be sampled, subsequently determine
the sampling frame, the method, select the sample, collect
the data and the validate the sampling results” (Ghauri,
Gronhaug and Kristianslund 1995)
A study population is the aggregate of the element for which
the sample is drawn (Jankowicz, 1994)
The sampling frame for the survey comprises of both male and
female who use loyalty card at Tesco.
3.4 RESEARCH PROCEDURE
According to Flink (1995), “a survey is a system for collecting information,
comparing, or explaining knowledge, attitudes or behaviour.
Survey involves setting objectives for information collection,
designing, research preparing, collection instrument, administering
and scoring the instrument, analysing data and reporting the
results”.
In addition to the above factors research ethics were at the
core of the survey. As outlined by the ‘Ethical Principles
and Guideline for Research with Human Participation’,
“All researchers, whether they are members of staff,
postgraduate or undergraduate students are advised to check
the Ethical Research Code before carrying out their research”.
When collecting the data, the investigator strictly adhered
to the Ethical Principles and Guideline for Research with
Human Participation, as well as two codes, the Marketing Research
Society Code of Conduct and The Data Protection Act, as the
research was aware of the importance of these codes in conducting
a professional research.
3.5 SAMPLING
In principle, there are two main types of sampling,
probability and non-probability. For this research probability
sampling was chosen. In probability sampling each element
of the population has an equal chance of being selected (Kinnear
and Taylor 1991).
3.6 PROBABILITY SAMPLING
There are five main probability sampling techniques, namely
random, systematic, stratified, cluster, and area sampling.
Each technique possesses unique characteristics that will
affect it’s application in a given research project.
Random sampling was chosen for the research.
Probability sample have been used in the research, as the
population was know and each consumer had an equal opportunity
of being included in the sample. By selecting the unites of
the researched sample randomly, the author attempted to ensure
that “each score of the population had an equal chance
to be included or sampled.
Moreover, random sampling procedure allows the establishment
of a statistical relationship between the sample estimates
and the population value. What probability sampling permits
is the calculation of the likely extent according to which
the sample value differs from the population (Grimm 2000).
According to Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (1996)
many researchers for example Moser and Kalton (1986) and
Henry (1990) argue
that using sampling enable a higher overall accuracy. They
point out that the smaller number of cases for which you need
to collect data led to more time can be spent designing and
piloting the means of collecting data. Collecting data from
few enables cares as well as the collection of more detailed
information.
However the sampling procedure has its own limitation,
which the researcher was fully aware of.
3.7 LIMITATON OF PROBABILITY SAMPLING
There are various limitation and potential errors associated
with the chosen kind of sampling. According to Ghauri, Gronhaug
and Kristianslund (1995) probability sampling are easy to
draw, but they may give misleading results, in spite of the
research judgement, which could lead to unrepresentative results
of the findings. The cost of obtaining the sample can also
be high if the units are geographically scattered. One other
major drawback of probability sampling is that the sample
gives no basis for evaluating the size of the sampling variation
and the error of estimation.
3.8 SAMPLE FRAME
The sample frame was Tesco consumer with loyalty card, which
according the supermarkets are around 100,000 per month. Each
consumer stopped was asked if they buy have a Tesco loyalty
card. If they did, they represented the 100,000 Tesco club
card shoppers. Asda and Tesco were chosen for the research
primarily due to the fact that the retailer using the loyalty
scheme.
However, having chosen only one supermarket retailer, the
researcher recognise the fact that there is an element of
bias. Due to resource and time limitation, it was not possible
to carry out the survey on all the retailers’ supermarket
in the area.
3.9 DETERMINATION OF SAMPLE SIZE
According to Jankowicz, (1994) generalisation about the population
from data collected using any sample is based on probability.
In order to be able to generalise about the research finding
to the population, it is necessary to select samples of sufficient
size. A large sample size will in general improve the quality
of the research. A large sample size is always better than
a small one. Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (1996) also point
out that the larger the sample size, the lower the likely
error in the generalising to the population.
When the population size is known, the most commonly and
appropriate formula to determine the size is (Katou, 1998)
:
2 (Za/2) x P (1-p) x N n= 2 2 e x (N-1) +(Za/2) x P (1-p)
n= sample size
N=population
Proportion of the possessing a given attitude
N= allowable error (0.05)
N= allowable error (0.05)Za/2=confidence level in terms of sp (95%)
Firstly the sample size is the monthly Club card consumer
of Tesco as stated previous is around 100,000. The variance
p was estimated. The difference between p1 and p2 is defined;
p1 is the percentage of people who took part in the research
(p1=0.60) and p2 the percentage of the total population of
consumers who buy shop at Tesco in Battersea. A confidence
level of 95% (the commonly used one). Statistically a 95 %
confidence level includes standard error. From the equation
the following resulted are found:
N1= 86.66 and n2=368.66
N1and N2=86.66+368.66= 517 sample unites.
Since the sample size was very big, it would be very hard
to examine the whole sample size due to time and cost constraints.
Therefore for this reason, the survey was only carried out
on 20% of the sample size. This did not affect the validity
of the survey; therefore the final sample size will be 20
% of 517, which were 106 people. Ghauri, Gronhaug and Kristianslund
(1995) identified that “there is no limit of a sample
that can be useful. A sample of 100 can be often giving interesting
and valuable results”. Based on Ghauri, Gronhaug and
Kristianslund’s guideline, this is a good sample size
for the survey.
3. 10 QUESTIONNAIRE
A questionnaire is a formalised pre-formulated written
set of questions scheduled to collect data from the respondent
(Sekaran 1992). A questionnaire is therefore an efficient
data collection mechanism whose objective is to measure behaviour
attitudes and respondents’ characteristics.
Questionnaires were the chosen mode to gathering information
from consumers. This gave the researcher an opportunity to
get first hand unbiased information from the respondents.
Guidelines as to how to respond to the questionnaires were
given when appropriate to eliminate unnecessary ambiguity
and reduce time commitment.
However questionnaires do pose ethical problems associated
with the use of interviewers, such as contact with strangers
and the avoidance of possible embarrassing questions. To avoid
this ‘Ethical Principles and Guideline for Research
with Human Participation’ was followed.
Apart from ethical issues, in order to eliminate any obscure
intent and wrong order of questions such as awkward expression
and leading questions so as to capture the much-needed information,
a pilot survey was carried out.
For easy analysis, the questionnaire was short, easy and
related a great deal to the hypothesis and research objectives.
This was done in order to answer the research question as
well as to evaluate the hypothesis developed.
In question focused on asking the 4 main questions:
Does the consumer own Tesco loyalty card?
Does the consumers own any other Loyalty card including Tesco?
Do the club cards benefits determine they shop?
Does Tesco offer better club benefits to the consumers?
By asking these questions the researcher was able to determine
how loyal consumers are to Tesco. Furthermore the vital point
of consumers switching from one retailer to the other was
determined by asking f consumers own other cards.
However because the questionnaire was made up of 4-point
scale, there was not midpoint, which one could argue introduce
the element of bias.
3.11SOURCE OF ERROR AND BIAS
Knowledge of sources of error and an examination for their
presence is a pre-requisite for all studies involving data
analysis (Moser and Kalton (1986). An overview of total error
and its components is given in figure below. Potential errors/biases
concerned the researches are highlighted and are dealt with
below.
3.12 MEASURING INSTRUMENT BIAS
The instrument structure was similar to that by Kinnear
and Taylor (1991). An issue of concern is whether offering
a neutral position on a likert type of scale in the questionnaire,
respondents would have a tendency to opt for middle of the
road reply this leading to bias (Lockhart and Russo 1994;
Schuman and Presser 1981; Moser and Kalton 1979). A decision
was therefore taken to use a 4-point likert scale without
a neutral position.
3.13 VALIDITY
“The validity if constructs is a necessary condition
for theory development testing and therefore, construct validity
lies at the very heart of scientific progress in marketing”(Flink
1995). Constructs or question validity is the degree to which
a question achieves the empirical and theoretical meaning
(Ghauri P, Gronhaug and Kristianslund 1995). The two attributes
of measurement concerning research are reliability and validity
(Jankowicz, 1994). Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (1996) define
reliability as “the amount of agreement between independent
attempt to measure the same theoretical concept”.
For the research to have construct validity, the investigator
strictly adhered to the Ethical Principles and Guideline for
Research with Human Participation (appendix). This gave the
research more validity and reliability and helped in reducing
some of the bias shown in the figure above.
3.14 RELIABILTY
Sekaran (1992) and Bell (1993) argue “respondent are
more likely to volunteer a neutral response if the interviewer
offers it as an option. In the study a neutral option was
not offered at the likert scale 1 to 4. Before the interview
began an explanation was given to each interviewee on (1)
how to answer the questions and (2) how to interpret their
response. This was to reduce the concern potential neutrality
bias.
3.15 INTERVIEW BIAS
To maintain low levels of this type of bias a single interviewer
conducted the who survey, the author. This ensured consistency
of asking, explaining and recording. A single interviewer
introduced uniform and systemic bias. It was felt this would
lower and preferable to the divergent bias resulting to no
bias.
3.16 SAMPLE FRAME BIAS
A potential bias resulting from an unrepresentative sample
frame was considered. Although the survey was confined to
Asada and Tesco in Battersea area only, the sample finding
were generalised to represent the branded and private label
water consumer. However in more research, a sample is used
and the findings are generalised to the whole population.
According to Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (1996) before using
your questionnaire to collect data it should be tested. The
purpose of the pilot test is to define the questionnaire that
respondents will have no difficulties in answering the questions
as well as recording the data. In addition, it enabled the
researcher to obtain some assessment of the questions ‘validity
and reliability’ of data collected.
There is a temptation in a study to go straight to the questionnaire,
but however hard pressed for time you are, do your best to
give questionnaire a trial run…. (Bell 1994).
Pilot survey refers to the initial testing of one or more
aspect of the research design (Sekaran, 1992). Therefore for
these reasons before the questionnaire was ready for the field
operation, a pre-tested or pilot survey was undertaken. The
researcher pre-tested the questionnaire among the prospective
research participates of 30 respondents at Tesco where the
survey was going to be conducted. According to Bell (1994)
, 10 questionnaires is a good minimum for a pilot study. Therefore
30 subjects was a reasonable good number for a trial run (pilot).
The 30 subjects were of the same characteristic to the sample
that was going to take part in the research. Furthermore the
pilot was carried out in the same location the research survey
took place.
Spelling and grammar mistakes were discovered in the questionnaires.
Minor adjustments were made to the questionnaire for the final
data collection. Moreover the piloting determined that time
needed for each questionnaire was 4-6 minutes for each respondent.
318 DATA COLLECTION
Data was collected by means of questionnaire outside
Tesco. This was only done having gained permission to do so
from the respective retailer management. The questionnaire
was carried out on Saturday and Sunday for one hour during
the morning, midday and afternoon. Consumers were stopped,
permission to ask them was sought to spare their time in answering
the questionnaire. Furthermore, consumers were assured that
their information was going to be kept strictly confidential.
Having gained their permission and trust, the researcher went
ahead to ask the question.
Do you need some more research material? We have hundreds of free essays available in our online resource library - essays not just on marketing but from all the major subject areas...
Please note: The above essays and dissertations were written by students and then submitted to us to display and help others. Thanks to all the students who have submitted their work to us.
Learn How to Write Better Marketing Essays ...
Our Qualified Marketing Research Writers...
Can write 100% unique essays in any of the following areas:
marketing plans
direct marketing
buyer behaviour
market sector analysis
advertising management
B2B and B2C marketing
internet marketing
CRM techniques
retail management
market research
export marketing
international strategies
brand management
marketing communications
promotional strategies
market power
advertising research
global marketing
Infact... Any Topic That is Marketing Related We Can Write About It!