It is now a matter of common public
acceptance that smoking causes ill health. This statement can be backed up by
huge amounts of authoritative literature (Dobson et al 1999) (Smoking Kills
1998) (Choosing Health 2001)
The subject of this essay however,
is whether or not it is a Public Health issue. We will argue strongly that it
is and produce evidence to support this stance.
The Wanless Report (2002 ) defines
Public Health as The science and art of preventing disease, prolonging life
and promoting health through organised efforts and informed choices of society,
organisations - public and private, communities and individuals
On that basis we would suggest that
the argument is already made since there is little doubt that smoking - both
active and passive - will shorten life and cause disease.
The evidence to support this
statement comes from papers such as that by Prescott ( et al. 1998) who carried
out a huge study looking into the effects of primary smoking and the risk of
myocardial ischaemia in the general population. The results of the study were
absolutely unequivocal with a finding of an increased risk of myocardial
infarction in women of 2.24 and in men of 1.43. the reasons for the sex
difference are several including genetic factors (Bennett 2004) and hormonal
factors (Chapman 1999)
To take a step further back, we
have to define Health
An authoritative definition of
Health comes from the WHO who currently tell us that health is a state of
complete physical, mental and social wellbeing and not merely the
absence of disease or infirmity. ( WHO 1992). A difficulty with this
definition is that today many people confuse the attainment of happiness with
the attainment of health (Kemm 2001). Ironically, in the context of this essay,
Freud also offered us an observation on the definition of Health when he observed
that most people equated well-being with happiness rather than health (Freud
1975) and he amplified this by observing that he had been advised by his
doctors to give up cigars in order to improve his health. He commented that he
was far more healthy but much less happy (Saracci 1997).
Although Freud's comment was
clearly flippant, it does exemplify a deeper truth, that part of the problem
with smoking is the pleasure that some people derive from it. One can always
advance the argument that in a free society one should always have freedom of
choice to damage yourself if you wish. (Hegel 1971)
That is clearly the case, but in
adopting that view you must also accept two further consequences of that
position. One is that society is expected to pick up the bill when you are ill
(via the NHS) and that by smoking, you may not only damage yourself but you may
well damage others through the medium of passive smoking. (Kuhse & Singer
2001)
It is these latter points which
actually make the issue one of Public Health.
The Public (in general terms) are
expected to fund the necessary treatment when you become ill. This is not an
isolated incident as over 200,000 patients are diagnosed annually with some
form of smoking related malignancy and over 120,000 will die from the disease.
This is quite independent of those that develop other complications of
smoke-related illness. (NHS Cancer Plan 2000). If you add to this number, the
carers and the other economic costs to the community, the argument that it is not
a Public Health issue clearly fails.
We have raised the issue of passive
smoking as one of the criteria for suggesting that smoking is an issue of
public health. The evidence for this is rapidly accumulating. We can point to
the cleverly designed study by He (et al.2004) which was able to point to the
statistical differences in illness rates between those industrial workers who
had a constantly smoky atmosphere to breathe and those who were able to avoid
it. There is little doubt that choosing to smoke where others will inhale the
smoke is a demonstrably anti social behaviour.
As if to underline our view, we can
point to the fact that the Government takes a similar view as it has produced a
series of Government White Papers (Choosing Health 2004) (Building on the Best
2003) and regulations (Saving lives 1999) which are all aimed at improving the
health of the nation by reducing its collective exposure to cigarette smoke
Bennett & Gottleib 2004 Passive smoking more risky for
women with a missing gene. BMJ: 2004 Vol 26 320-322
Building on the best 2003 Department of Health: HMSO. 09/12/2003
Chapman S 1999 Smoking and Women: beauty before
age?
BMJ, Mar 1999; 318: 818.
Choosing Health 2004 Government White Paper consultation on improving
people's health 28.6.04
BMJ, Dec 2004; 319: 1522.
Dobson et al, 1999; National Centre for Social
Research, RCP, 1999;
Freud S. 1975 Letter to Lou Andreas-Salome, 1930
May 8. Cited in: Sigmund Freud house catalogue. Vienna: Löcker and Wögenstein,
1975: 49.
He, T H Lam, L S Li, L S Li, R Y
Du, G L Jia, J Y Huang, and J S Zheng2004 Passive smoking at work as a risk
factor for coronary heart disease in Chinese women who have never smoked
BMJ, Feb 2004; 308: 380 - 384.
Hegel GW. 1971 Philosophy of Mind: Being Part
Three of the Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences (1830). Wallace W,
trans. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1971.
Kemm 2001 The pursuit of happiness Cancer Nurs. 2000;23(1):20-31
Kuhse & Singer 2001 A companion to bioethics ISBN: 063123019X Pub Date 05 July
2001
NHS Cancer plan 2000 A plan for investment, a plan for
reform Department of Health. HMSO.
27/09/2000
Prescott, Merit Hippie, Peter
Schooner, Hans Ole Hein, and Jørgen Vestbo 1998 Smoking and risk of myocardial
infarction in women and men: longitudinal population study
BMJ, Apr 1998; 316: 1043 - 1047
Saracci R 1997
The world health
organisation needs to reconsider its definition of health
BMJ, May 1997; 314: 1409.
Smoking Kills1998 A White Paper HMSO: December 1998
Wanless report: HMSO 2002 World Health
Organisation. 1996
Ethics and health, and
quality in health
care-report by the director general. Geneva: WHO, 1996. (Document No. EB
97/16.)
Do you need some more research material? We have hundreds of free essays available in our online resource library - essays not just on health but from all the major subject areas...
Please note: The above essays and dissertations were written by students and then submitted to us to display and help others. Thanks to all the students who have submitted their work to us.
Learn How to Write Better Health Essays & Improve Your Grades...
Our Qualified Health & Nursing Research Writers...
Can research & write 100% unique essays in any of the following areas:
health nutrition & diet
AIDS and the risks of HIV
alzheimers disease
alcohol & drug abuse
asthma treatment
STDs
palliative care
government health policies
clinical trials
hospital infection control
nurse prescribing
severe depression
health & domestic violence
occupational analysis
heart disease
stroke patient rehabilitation
breast cancer
medical errors
diabetes
healthcare professionals
Infact... Any Topic That is Health Related We Can Help You Write About It!